Skip to main content

2026-09-2-preparation-meeting-2/minutes

fg-tida-meetings-2026-09-2-preparation-meeting-2minutes-5-00

TypeMinutes
GroupTrust and Identity for Humans and Agentic AI
StateActive
AuthorsNot entered
Last updated2026-10-23 15:01 UTC

Formats and resources

Abstract

No abstract entered.

Meeting materials

Revisions

Compare revisions

Document text

FG-TIDA Interregnum Preparation Meeting — 2nd Meeting

Source: FG-TIDA Co-Chairs

Date: Virtual, 02 September 2026

WG(s): All

Original: English

Contacts:

Abstract

This document contains the agenda and minutes of the FG-TIDA 2nd preparation meeting (virtual, 2 September 2026, 100 participants), held during the "Interregnum" period between the launch of the Focus Group (9 July 2026, AI for Good Global Summit) and its first meeting (Paris, 1–4 December 2026).

1. Introduction

This document contains the agenda and minutes of the 2nd preparation meeting of the Focus Group on Trust and Identity for Humans and Agentic AI (FG-TIDA), held during the "Interregnum" period: the phase between the launch on 9 July 2026 at the AI for Good Global Summit and the first meeting in Paris on 1–4 December 2026. During this phase, the structure, leadership, and initial deliverables of the Focus Group are prepared, for approval at the Paris meeting.

Four preparation meetings are planned, all virtual: 29 July, 2 September, 30 September, and 4 November 2026. An additional virtual meeting was agreed during this session, proposed for 14 October 2026.

2. Meeting Overview

Timing Wednesday 2 September 2026, 13:59–16:08 CEST
Title 2nd FG-TIDA preparation meeting (Interregnum)
Electronic Method Online (electronic meeting system, with AI note-taker)
Chair Debora Comparin (Chair)
Present 100 participants (full list in Annex B)

3. Agenda

  1. Opening remarks and agenda adoption

  2. Recap of work done and next steps

  3. Draft plan for first in-person meeting in December (Paris)

  4. Use cases work in parallel to themes/WGs

  5. Presentation of three selected theme proposals

  6. Discussion on meeting cadence and any other business (AOB)

4. Actions

  • Debora Comparin to send invitation for proposed additional virtual meeting on 14 October 2026.

  • Amir Banifatemi and Trisha Chakraborty to finalize and publish the use case template on GitHub and guide community contributions.

  • Artur Hecker and Cyril Gorlla to coordinate offline on overlaps between theme 4 and theme 6 and explore possible collaboration or merging.

  • Henk Birkholz and Houda Labiod to prepare a presentation and GitHub issue summary on remote attestation for agentic AI for the next meeting.

  • Iván Abril Palma to share links and materials related to case studies and use cases for group reference.

  • Arnaud Taddei, Debora Comparin, and Amir Banifatemi to coordinate with Study Group 17 on contribution triage and redirecting relevant inputs to the Focus Group.

5. Discussion Summary

5.1 Introduction and Focus Group overview

The management team introduced themselves and clarified that TIDA is an open community, not requiring ITU membership to participate. Emphasis was placed on moving communication to mailing lists and using GitHub as the central collaboration platform. Participants are invited to join the mailing list here. Participants were reminded of the timeline and key dates for virtual and in-person meetings.

5.2 First in-person meeting planning

Stéphanie de Labriolle presented a provisional program for the December meeting in Paris. Opportunities for networking dinners and related events were highlighted. Final details are to be shared in the coming weeks.

5.3 Use cases and taxonomy work

Amir Banifatemi and Trisha Chakraborty introduced the use case template designed to capture functional scenarios involving agentic AI systems. The template includes fields such as title, sector, description, actors, actions, problems, mitigations, gaps, risk levels, theme relevance, requirements, assessment criteria, duplication check, maturity, IP/confidentiality, and assets. The template is a living document expected to evolve with community feedback and will be integrated into GitHub for direct issue tracking and collaboration in the coming week.

Discussion clarified that the initial focus is on functional interactions, with security aspects to be incorporated later. Participants raised points about linking use cases to existing ITU-T recommendations, threat modeling, and the importance of grounding use cases in real-world contexts. Iván Abril Palma suggested mapping use cases to case studies and challenges to simplify understanding and cross-group collaboration. Peter Shmitt shared use cases from 3GPP.

5.4 Theme presentations

  • Theme 4 (Artur Hecker) — Access control and security policy enforcement with metamorphic AI agents. Discussed the unique challenges of securing AI agents whose behavior is non-deterministic and morphing, and proposed studying new ways to represent AI agents in security policies beyond fixed identities. Two approaches were outlined: adapting classical security policies with invariant properties, or developing intent-based security policies using AI for enforcement.

  • Theme 6 (Cyril Gorlla) — Intent-based security policy expression, coexistence, and runtime verification. Focused on evaluating actions against security policies expressed as intents rather than identity-based rights. Introduced a framework with verdict states (permit, remediate, block, escalate, indeterminate) and the need for standardized decision semantics. Highlighted the concurrency of identity, trust, and evaluation questions across related themes. Plans to pilot in regulated financial services to test expression and verification.

  • Theme 8 (Henk Birkholz, Houda) — Remote attestation for agentic AI systems (teaser). Emphasized the importance of trustworthy evidence and provenance for AI agent assertions, and noted the intent to build on existing remote attestation work to address gaps specific to agentic AI. A detailed presentation is planned for the next meeting.

5.5 Coordination with Study Group 17

Paul B. Najarian raised a concern about new work items proposed in Study Group 17 that overlap with TIDA's scope. Arnaud Taddei confirmed that Study Group 17 will triage contributions to ensure proper allocation between the study group and the Focus Group. Coordination between Study Group 17 leadership and TIDA management will ensure clear boundaries and avoid duplication.

5.6 Meeting management and next steps

Agreement was reached to add an additional virtual meeting in October due to the volume of theme proposals. Participants were encouraged to engage via GitHub and mailing lists to streamline communication. Presenters and theme owners are to continue refining proposals and collaborate offline to resolve overlaps and define working groups.

Annex A — Schedule of FG-TIDA Preparation Meetings

Most recent meeting first.

Date Meeting
4 November 2026 4th preparation meeting (virtual)
14 October 2026 Additional virtual meeting, 2:30 pm CT (NEW)
30 September 2026 3rd preparation meeting (virtual)
2 September 2026 2nd preparation meeting (virtual) — held, 100 participants
29 July 2026 1st preparation meeting, 14:00 CEST (virtual) — held, 60 participants

First in-person meeting: First week of December 2026, Paris.

Second in-person meeting: 26 January 2027, Geneva.

Annex B — Meeting Participants

(tbc) = to be confirmed / transcript. AI note-taker (Leexi Assistant) is omitted.

Name Affiliation / Role
Debora Comparin Thales — Chair (meeting chair)
Amir Banifatemi Cognizant — Co-chair
Ward Duchamps Thales
Liangliang Zhang Huawei — Vice-Chair
Sounil Yu Knostic — Vice-Chair
Stéphanie de Labriolle Secure Identity Alliance
Arnaud Taddei Chair, ITU-T SG17
Trisha Chakraborty Cognizant
Artur Hecker Huawei
Cyril Gorlla CTGT
Henk Birkholz Fraunhofer SIT
Paul B. Najarian U.S. Department of State
Iván Abril Palma Integral Management Society
Frederick Kautz SAFE-MCP Maintainer
Patrice Lyons (tbc)
genrri (tbc)
Frank Van Damme Thales
Houda Labiod Huawei
Hugo Bruna Thales
Evaggelos Haleplidis University of Piraeus / Athena Research Center
Carina Blanco Freelancer
Yonatan Alejandro Arguello Thales
Justin Philip Flores (tbc)
Paul Templeman, PhD Australian Sports Commission
Cheng-Kang Chu Huawei
Latonia Gordon Apple
Radia Funna Build N Blaze
Yutaka Miyake NICT, Japan
Deng Haoran SRMC, China
Gianpaolo Angelo Scalone Vodafone
Alexandre Leforestier Panodyssey
HAMAGUCHI Soshi (濱口総志) Digital Agency, Japan
Koji Nakao NICT
OKAMOTO Kazuhiro (岡本和浩) Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan
Hu Zhiyuan (胡志远) vivo
Xiongwei Jia China Unicom
Michel Roberto Oliveira De Souza United Nations
Tunji Durodola Secure Identity Alliance
Antonio Maio INCM, Portugal
Pam Dixon World Privacy Forum
Erik / Eric Verheul Wellet
Leyi Zhang ZTE
Yuan Li (tbc)
Peter Schmitt Huawei — Chair, 3GPP TSG CT
Tayeb Ben Meriem (tbc)
Manuel Costa Cabral ANACOM, Portugal
Xiaoya Yang ITU TSB
Yuliya Kaspersky
Paul Sydney Orozco Thales
Arpita Sarker (tbc)
Syed Amir Hamza (tbc)
Camille Charaudeau Thales
Scott B. Courtney GoDaddy
Xuan-Phuc Pham Thales
Thierry Moineau BNP Paribas
Krishna Bahadur Karki NTA, Nepal
Jorge Perez NXP
Oleh Vasylenko Elixir LLC
Keerthi Thomas Digital Catapult
Serge Stinckwich United Nations University
Chris Wendt Somos
Anto Padi
Luca Boldrin Tinexta Infocert
Tony Holmes UK government - DSIT
Lydia Thayline LILY AI Safety Alliance
Lucia Cabanillas Rodriguez Telefónica
Ana Mendez Perez Telefónica
Meem Arafat Manab Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Nic Williams Infoblox
Pavlenko Olena (tbc)
Lei Gao (tbc)
Chris Hogg GSMA
Jingyi Zhang Huawei
Grace Rachmany Decentralized Identity Foundation
Nelson (tbc)
Jan Kjaersgaard IN Groupe
Hamza Forkit AI
Catherine Pergue (tbc)
Marjia Siddik Trinity College Dublin
Fabien Deboyser NXP
Thomas Lohninger epicenter.works
Dima Postnikov Scytales
Jun Zhang (tbc)
Jean-Paul Lemaire ITU SG17 Q11 Rapporteur
Catherine Vlasov Google
Venkatesh Subramanian Cognizant
Gilles Fayad AI Commons
Adriano Daddario Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy (MIMIT)
Ziyuan Hu (CN) (tbc)
Karuna Silwal Acharya (tbc)
Anastasia (tbc)
Bo Fjelkner Ericsson
Erika Beatriz Yoris Rojas ITU
Takahashi Takeshi (高橋健志) NICT, Japan
David Kelts Decipher.ID
Jinghua Min (tbc)
Shady human.tech
Naganuma Miho (永沼美保) NEC
Rachelle Sellung Fraunhofer IAO
Isaac Henderson Johnson Jeyakumar Fraunhofer IAO